Umbrella ยท Camp Verde, AZ

Umbrella insuranceand the water on your land.

Ditches, ponds, tanks and river frontage are ordinary on Verde Valley property. Water on land you own draws children, and the law takes a particular view of hazards that attract them.

An attractive nuisance is a hazard likely to draw children who cannot appreciate the danger. Water is the classic one.

Common Issues We Solve

What an umbrella does for a Camp Verde landowner

Three things about owning water.

Children are treated differently in law

The attractive nuisance principle recognizes that a child drawn to a hazard may not appreciate it, and it can impose a duty on a landowner even toward a child who was trespassing. Water is the classic example. The duty is to take reasonable steps, not to make the property impossible to enter.

Reasonable steps are mostly physical

Fencing, gates, signage and removing the means of access are what "reasonable" tends to mean in practice. None of it is expensive relative to the exposure, and all of it is evidence that the hazard was taken seriously if a claim ever arrives.

A drowning claim has no useful ceiling

This is one of a small number of residential exposures where the potential claim is limited only by the circumstances. Standard liability limits are not sized for it. An umbrella is the only practical way to carry cover proportionate to the risk.

What Is Covered

What we look at for a Camp Verde umbrella

Water, access and children.

What water is on or beside the property

Ponds, tanks, ditches and river frontage all count.

How the property is secured

Fencing and gates are both protection and evidence.

The underlying liability limit

Almost always too low for this particular exposure.

Get a Quote

Get a Camp Verde umbrella quote

Tell us what water is on the land and how the property is fenced.

Request a Camp Verde quote

We size the limit for the one exposure that has no ceiling.

Request a quote
FAQ

Umbrella questions from Camp Verde

There is an irrigation ditch across my land. Am I responsible?
Potentially, particularly where children are concerned. The attractive nuisance principle can impose a duty toward a child drawn to a hazard even if they were trespassing. The duty is to take reasonable steps rather than to make the land impenetrable, and fencing and signage are what that usually means.
What about the river frontage?
Similar principles apply to the part you control. You are not responsible for the river, and you can be responsible for how easily somebody reaches a dangerous spot from your property. Securing access is both sensible and useful evidence if anything happens.
How much cover is sensible with water on the property?
More than a standard limit. A drowning claim is one of the few residential exposures with no practical ceiling, and the limits set by default on a homeowners policy were never intended for it. We will work through a figure with you rather than quoting a default.