Sedona owns 72.6% of its homes and devotes much of the rest to visitors. For the people who live and work here year round, rental housing is scarce, and that scarcity changes what a policy needs to do.
Loss of use is only as good as the housing it can buy. In a tight market that limit gets tested first.
Three things that follow from a town where long-term rentals are hard to find.
If your rental becomes uninhabitable, the policy pays the additional cost of living somewhere else. In a town where short-term accommodation is priced for visitors and long-term rentals barely exist, that cost is high and the standard limit was not calculated with it in mind. This is the clause most worth raising here.
Tenancies that move, overlap or pause for a season leave belongings in more than one place and the policy pointing at one address. Nothing about that is unusual here and all of it is worth saying at the quote.
Replacing a home is not just paperwork when there is nothing available to rent. The number of months on the loss of use clause matters as much as the dollar figure, and the two are stated separately.
The clause that carries the weight in this market.
Both stated, both usually left at a default built for a normal rental market.
Seasonal and shifting arrangements need the address question answered properly.
Furnished rentals change the total considerably in both directions.
Tell us whether the place is furnished and whether the tenancy runs all year.
We raise the loss of use limits to something this market can actually buy.
Request a quote